Good governance – why non-profits should care, and be involved
By Tshikululu Social Investments on 6 September 2012
Categories: Corporate Interest, NGO Interest
G
ood governance is essential to the long-term sustainability of any organisation working in South Africa, says Tshikululu CEO, Tracey Henry.
When people organise communally to achieve a certain purpose, whether that purpose is to increase financial value for shareholders or to maximise social capital and quality of life for stakeholders, principles of governance will, at some stage, become material to the organisation’s ability to achieve that purpose in an ethical and sustainable manner.
Organisations, whether for profit or non-profit, ought to set roughly similar goals in order to be as effectual as possible. These goals include, importantly, the effective management of risk and sustainability challenges to maximise the creation of social or other value over the short, medium and long term, and a high standard of ethical leadership. Good governance has additional benefits for non-profit organisations, including accountability to all stakeholders, and increased transparency.
Over the last five years, several codes have been written to make explicit those principles which most effectively translate into good governance of non-profits. These include The Department of Social Development’s Code of Good Practice for South African Non-profit Organisations (2001), the King Code of Governance for South Africa (King III, 2009), and The Independent Code of Governance and Values for Non-profit Organisations in South Africa (2012).
The spectrum of non-profits itself ranges considerably, from informal structures involving a handful of individuals, to well-funded multinational organisations with complex organisational structures. No one code of good governance can therefore realistically be expected to be universally applicable. Therefore, each organisation and its executive, should have a clear understanding of all the relevant codes and then decide on the applicability of various principles and how they would relate to the organisation’s size, context, and objectives.
An important characteristic that these codes share in relation to non-profits is their aspirational and voluntary nature, focus on self-regulation, and emphasis on principles and values over rules and regulations. This allows for flexibility in the application of these codes to organisations that may be constituted and run in markedly dissimilar ways.
Notwithstanding, each organisation needs to ensure compliance with legislated requirements, such as the Income Tax Act of 1962, the Trust Property Control Act of 1998, The Non-Profit Organisations Act of 1997, and so on.
The King Committee recognises the importance and significance of the non-profit sector in addressing poverty and inequality. As a result, the committee has convened a special sub-committee tasked with researching and making recommendations on how the principles and practice recommendations contained in King III will apply to non-profit organisations.
The work of the sub-committee culminated in the drafting of the practice note for the application of King III to non-profit organisations, which provide guidance to non-profit organisations on how sound governance can be achieved, and is available free of charge as an electronic download from the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa’s website.
By improving governance in the non-profit sector, we ultimately achieve better-managed organisations that are equipped to make a meaningful long-term contribution to the development of South African communities everywhere.


Comment posted by Lucienne Kelfkens
Some brief ideas from an implementation perspective:
1. Develop a growth implementation model for the Code to have profound effect
A. first phase: Experience the Code. What is it like to work with the Code? Where does it enhance the credibility of the organization, what are the limitations?
B. second phase: Support implementation via coaching model. NGOs that are looking for similar support can group together and share a facilitator to improve implementation of the Code
C. third phase: Select a Committee that will define the minimum implementation standards of the Code. If the NGO sector wants to continue to take themselves seriously, they should also set minimum standards for quality to adhere to. Once those standards are (self!) defined, could the Code work as some sort of quality warranty to peers and the outside world?
Comment posted by Tracey Henry
Dear Lucienne
Thank you for your practical suggestions. The idea of firstly experiencing the code, followed by working with a coach or peers to improve the implementation of the code would enhance its applicability and hopefully, lead to self-regulation, with the ultimate aim of strengthening organisations and enhancing sustainability.